“It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity.” – Albert Einstein
Such situation is true even as of now. It’s no doubt that the invention of the atomic bomb has brought unforseen destruction that left a wound that even refuses to heal up to now. If history is bound to repeat itself then it has during the explosive advance of information technology, now with a greater blast radius, global effect and the damage irreversible. Just kidding. Haha. Of course that’s one way some people see it, paranoid in a way, but you cannot discount that the recent explosion caught the whole world unawares. The creator of the ‘love bug’ got away scot free because there was no legislation passed at the time of the offense, millions of dollars were lost; the internet also become a haven for sex offenders from all around the world and it was just recently that US authorities started to agressively arrest offenders (MySpace profiles lead to sex-offender arrests – By PEGGY O’HARE Copyright 2007 Houston Chronicle). Clearly there is an apparent gap between the legislation for information technology and the technology itself. The article calls for immediate action, we have to deal with it because it’s not that it’s happening it JUST happened.
Intellectual Property
An article in Wikipedia regarding 21st century talks about Intellectual property:
The increasing popularity of digital formats for entertainment media such as movies and music, and the ease of copying and distributing it via the Internet and peer-to-peer networks, has raised concerns in the media industry about copyright infringement. Much debate is proceeding about the proper bounds between protection of copyright, trademark and patent rights versus fair use and the public domain, where some argue that such laws have shifted greatly towards intellectual property owners and away from the interests of the general public in recent years, while others say that such legal change is needed to deal with the threat of new technologies against the rights of authors and artists (or, as others put it, against the outmoded business models of the current entertainment industry). Domain name “cybersquatting” and access to patented drugs to combat epidemics in third-world countries are other IP concerns.
Commerce and trade according to Atty. Chan-Gonzaga changed in the 21st century with GATS and the apparent globalization. A country like the Philippines cannot keep herself in recluse while its neighbors take a slice from the new world with its vast potentials still untapped. A lawyer in the Philippines may offer services of mediation for parties in Singapore through email; giant internet companies like Google and Microsoft are in constant legal battle concerning new issues that arise from the products that they are selling and among the most common issues is intellectual property.
Profession vs. Trade?
Boundaries between nations start to fade, old legal terms need to be redefined (Cayetano v. Hernandez) and the relationship between client and lawyer may change as well. With the easily accessible and oft cheap means of communication, a budding new culture has surfaced and the nature of relationship between individuals are also affected. The question of lawyering being a profession is questioned and challenged again. The internet has spun an intricate web connecting us to everyone around the world that at most times, communication become less personal which tends to make lawyering lean towards just being a commodity.
Lawyering at the 21st century emphasizes the need for lawyers and the law to keep up with the past paced change in the internet and to the future lawyers, there are new frontiers that opened up with it. This is reminiscent of the emperialism in the 1500s where countries like Britain and others in Europe set out to the new world discovering new resources and opening new trade routes. Can we keep up?
Lanuza Pictures by Kage








